Clin Infect Immun
Clinical Infection and Immunity, ISSN 2371-4972 print, 2371-4980 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Clin Infect Immun and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.ciijournal.org

Original Article

Volume 7, Number 2, September 2022, pages 49-57


Human Vitreous Humor Serves as an Effective Extracellular Matrix for an In Vitro Granuloma System to Study Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection

Shubhang Bhallaa, Joel Rodgersa, Jeffrey Allisona, Jose Barragana, Ricardo Belmaresa, Jorge Cervantesa, b

aPaul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, El Paso, TX, USA
bCorresponding Author: Jorge L. Cervantes, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, El Paso, TX 79905, USA

Manuscript submitted July 8, 2022, accepted September 15, 2022, published online September 29, 2022
Short title: Vitreous Humor in Mtb In Vitro Granuloma
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cii157

Abstract▴Top 

Background: Granuloma formation is the hallmark of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection. This blockade by leukocytes prevents dissemination and develops a niche that provides the mycobacteria’s survival. The extracellular matrix (ECM) facilitates the differentiation and activation of macrophages that compose the granuloma. Current commercially available sources of ECMs do not provide effective models to study this complex pathophysiology. Human vitreous humor (hVH) has demonstrated to work as an effective ECM for fibroblast differentiation.

Methods: Here we describe the use of hVH as an ECM for an in vitro granuloma model upon Mtb infection. THP-1 human monocytes containing reporter plasmids for nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-kB) and interferon regulatory factor (IRF) were seeded onto hVH obtained from human cadavers. Cells were then cultured under three conditions: hVH only, hVH + vitamin D3, and hVH + phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA). After 3 days, macrophages were inoculated with Mtb. Formation, length, and area of aggregation were measured over time. Supernatants were also collected to measure the activity of NF-kB and IRF transcription factors.

Results: We observed that human monocyte-derived macrophages form granulomatous-like monocytic aggregate (GLMA) in hVH as of day 1 in all conditions, with peaks on days 3 and 6. Uninfected controls exhibited no aggregate formation. Significantly, NF-kB activation precedes IRF activation over time in cells infected with Mtb.

Conclusions: Our findings support the use of hVH as a viable ECM model to study Mtb granuloma formation and provide evidence of cell activation. Inclusion of other cell types into this system may better mimic human tissue phenomena and improve our understanding of the Mtb granuloma formation process.

Keywords: Vitreous humor; In vitro granuloma; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Macrophages

Introduction▴Top 

Tuberculosis (TB) occurs upon infection with its causative agent, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) [1]. The lungs are the primary site of infection by Mtb, and the clinical spectrum ranges from primary TB (5-10% of Mtb infections) to latent asymptomatic infection (LTBI) (95% of Mtb infections) [2, 3]. LTBIs represent a state of equilibrium in which the host can curtail the infection but not eradicate the bacteria. While LTBI has a low risk of mortality, it serves as a reservoir for transmission, and confers risk for TB reactivation stemming from increased host-susceptibility [1, 4]. Approximately 5-15% of latent infections reactivate and manifest as active TB [5].

The host immune response to Mtb infection leads to the formation of hallmark lesions of TB infection, i.e., granulomas, constituted by aggregates of myeloid cells circumscribed by a lymphocytic cuff [6]. The TB granuloma generates an immune microenvironment that prevents extrapulmonary dissemination of Mtb, but provides a niche for its survival, cementing Mtb infection latency [7].

Understanding the host response to Mtb infection is critical to eradicating TB. The development of novel TB therapeutics benefits from a better understanding of the interaction between host-response and Mtb infection. Our current understanding of TB pathophysiology relies on existing in vivo and in vitro models. Various pre-clinical models using various animal species are used extensively, with the limitation in the translatability of findings to the human host [8, 9]. In vitro systems permit dynamic investigations that are not possible clinically or challenging to recreate in animal models. Recommendations for an optimal Mtb-in vitro model include: the use of primary human, mononuclear phagocytic cells and a physiological extracellular matrix (ECM) to mimic host cell survival and Mtb pathogenesis [10]. Current in vitro models for studying granuloma formation, such as cell culture on a collagen matrix, 3D bioelectrospray, organoids, and multicellular lung tissue model, have been insufficient in recreating the immune environment of an infected human host and have model-specific technical challenges [11, 12].

The lung ECM plays a critical role in granuloma formation and Mtb transmission [13]. Commercially available sources of ECM are limited to collagen and synthetic matrices, and although these substances facilitate granuloma formation, they do not accurately reflect the complexity of the human tissue [14]. Recently, the use of vitreous humor (VH) as a potential ECM for cartilage tissue engineering application has been demonstrated [15].

We aimed to develop a novel in vitro model to study Mtb infection in a more physiologically representative microenvironment. Recent applications of VH in tissue engineering highlight its potential to serve as an ECM [15].

In our study, we utilized human vitreous humor (hVH) as a source of ECM to develop an in vitro granulomatous-like system of human monocyte-derived macrophages. Our results demonstrate that hVH can serve as a viable source of ECM to activate macrophages and promote cellular aggregation resembling granuloma formation upon exposure to Mtb.

Materials and Methods▴Top 

VH

hVH was harvested from cadavers from the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso Willed Body Donor Program. Approval from the Anatomical Board of the State of Texas to use the donor bodies for educational and research purposes is in existence. The eyes were resected using aseptic technique and dissected to extract the vitreous body according to the established protocol by Murali et al [16]. Multiple donor-cadavers were utilized for hVH extraction, with each extraction being isolated. For each experiment (N), only one cadaver-derived hVH was utilized and matched for all samples in that trial.

In vitro cellular aggregation system

Human monocytic THP1-dual cells (Invivogen) were differentiated under three conditions upon being plated directly onto hVH. Cells were either untreated, differentiated into macrophages with 10 µM of vitamin D3 (VD), 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D (Sigma) or with 5 ng/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma-Aldrich) for 72 h. Cells were then infected with gamma-irradiated Mtb Indo-Oceanic strain (BEI Resources) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10:1, at OD600 3.13 × 107 micro-organisms, for 3, 7 or 10 days. Uninfected controls for each condition were also followed up for the same period of time to assess any cell aggregates. Cells were observed and photographed daily for the appearance of macrophage aggregates, when number, size and area were measured.

Data collection and analysis

Light microscopy photos of each well were taken daily at × 20 magnification and imported to ImageJ (National Institute of Health). The number of total cellular aggregates was manually counted daily and measurements for area and length on the longest axis were determined using ImageJ’s toolkit. These data were then plotted and analyzed for growth patterns in both aggregate size and area. Metrics were compared between each Mtb condition and control to assess quantified difference. NF-kB and IRF activation were assessed on cell supernatants according to manufacturers’ instructions on a Synergy HTX Multi-Mode plate reader (BioTek). Values were expressed as response ratios compared to the unstimulated wells. Comparisons were performed using a t-test, or a non-parametric test if the data followed or not a normal distribution. Group analysis (of infected vs. Mtb-infected conditions) was performed using ANOVA, for comparison between the different conditions over time.

Results▴Top 

VH induces differentiation of human monocytes into macrophages

Before inoculation with Mtb, THP-1 monocyte differentiation towards macrophage cell fate occurred in all conditions, i.e., VH alone, VH + PMA, and VH + VD. Induced differentiation of monocytes to macrophage following a 72-h incubation with PMA and VD was expected. Macrophage differentiation to occur after exposure to VH alone, however, was a remarkable finding (Fig. 1).


Click for large image
Figure 1. Monocyte differentiation utilizing VH as ECM in vitro. Light microscopy images of day 3 conditions demonstrating characteristic monocyte differentiation into macrophages. Culture-specific differentiated macrophages are highlighted (red circle) with opposing non-differentiated cells to demonstrate change in morphology and signify evidence of monocytic differentiation. ECM: extracellular matrix; VH: vitreous humor.

VH promotes characteristic granulomatous-like formation upon exposure to Mtb

When the cell culture system was inoculated with Mtb, granuloma-like monocytic aggregation (GLMA) was observed till day 10 (Fig. 2). The total number of GLMAs increased at a variable rate, with a peak observed on day 3 (primary peak). Between days 4 - 5, there is a reduction in the number of GLMAs, followed by an increase on day 6 (secondary peak), and then a consistent decline between days 7 and 10. Uninfected controls, without Mtb, showed no macrophage aggregate formation (n = 5).


Click for large image
Figure 2. Mtb induces in vitro primary monocytic aggregate cuff formation. (a) In vitro infection-induced monocytic aggregate formation over time upon Mtb inoculation (N = 5) (*NS = not statistically significant). Uninfected samples did not display similar cellular aggregation. (b) Light microscopy imaging with observed THP-1 aggregation in MTb-infected cultures compared to control condition that lacked granuloma-like monocytic aggregation. Mtb: Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Light microscopy imaging on day 3 demonstrated characteristic macrophage aggregation in Mtb-inoculated conditions (VH, VH + VD, and VH + PMA) compared to control conditions. THP-1 aggregates show a center of less discernible cell composition, possibly containing necrotic cells, which was observed as early as day 3 post-Mtb inoculation in all conditions (Fig. 2).

Comparative analysis of GLMA number, length, and area between Mtb-infected conditions (i.e., VH, VH + VD, and VH + PMA) showed a variable increase of these parameters from days 1 to 3 followed by a primary peak on day 3 (Fig. 3). The highest total number of GLMAs was observed in VH alone condition (51 ± 14.04), followed by VH + PMA (36 ± 7.815), and VH + VD (23 ± 10.54) (Fig. 3a). The largest average length and area were also observed around day 3 (Fig. 3b, c). There was a decrease in these measures between days 4 and 5 followed by a secondary peak observed on day 6. At the secondary peak, VH + VD has the highest number of GLMAs (22.5 ± 7.815), average length (430 ± 152.645 pixels), and area (58,340 ± 21,950.2 pixels2), followed by VH + PMA and VH alone, respectively. From days 7 to 10, we observed a variable decline in all measures and an attenuation of granulomatous response to Mtb infection.


Click for large image
Figure 3. In vitro GLMA formation upon Mtb inoculation. Average GLMA number (a), average GLMA length (b), and average GLMA area (c) data collected over 10 days in VH, VH + VD, VH + PMA conditions inoculated with Mtb (*N = 5) (*NS = not statistically significant). ANOVA group analysis. GLMA: granuloma-like monocytic aggregate; Mtb: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; VH: vitreous humor; VD: vitamin D3; PMA: phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; ANOVA: analysis of variance.

VH facilitates macrophage immune response against Mtb

Two main immune response transcription factors, interferon regulatory factor (IRF) and NF-kB pathway activity are needed to mount an inflammatory response against Mtb infection. IRF activation increased from day 0 to day 7 for all conditions with a subsequent decrease by day 10 (Fig. 4a). Although not statistically significant, the VH only condition had the highest IRF activation, compared to VD and PMA (Fig. 4a). VH + VD has the lowest IRF activation.


Click for large image
Figure 4. Inflammatory transcription factor activation in in vitro GLMA upon Mtb infection. (a) IRF activation measured by luciferase activity (QL), and (b) NF-kB activation measured by alkaline phosphatase (QB). Average response ratios (*N = 3) (*NS = not statistically significant). ANOVA group analysis. GLMA: granuloma-like monocytic aggregate; Mtb: Mycobacterium tuberculosis; IRF: interferon regulatory factor; NF-kB: nuclear factor kappa-B; VH: vitreous humor; PMA: phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, VD: vitamin D3; QB: QUANTI-Blue; ANOVA: analysis of variance.

NF-kB pathway activation, on the other hand, was higher on day 3 on VH only condition, followed by a variable decline (Fig. 4b). Notably, the VH + VD and VH + PMA showed a constant NF-kB activation throughout the observed period, despite granuloma formation (Figs. 2 and 4b).

Discussion▴Top 

In the lungs, the ECM is a bioactive milieu that plays a critical role in the response to infection and inflammation [17]. The ECM is composed of a myriad of components (predominantly collagen, alongside fibronectin, laminin, proteoglycans, and hyaluronate) that modulate host-pathogen interaction in TB [18]. Cell-matrix interactions affect phagolysosome fusion, pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion, and immune cell activation during Mtb infection [19-21]. Nevertheless, in vitro experiments dissecting intracellular signaling pathways in TB are predominately performed in the absence of an ECM [22]. Current in vitro models that incorporate an ECM to study TB are limited, predominantly using collagen and synthetic matrices [7]. Use of collagen matrices and human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) have shown to develop histological features observed in human TB, such as granulomatous aggregates. However, limitations of these models include low throughput, difficulty in incorporating additional cell types, and lack of natural collagenase to observe ECM destruction, the latter of which is a critical step in Mtb dissemination and transmission [12]. The multicellular lung tissue model and 3D bioelectrospray are modified collagen matrix models that seek to address the limitations of the standard models by incorporating protease-producing cell lineages and increasing translational applications, respectively [12]. Cost-of-use, translation to high throughput, and limited addition of other immune cells remain the most notable challenges [12]. Furthermore, acellular synthetic matrices lack the complexity of human tissue [23].

Current recommendations for an optimal in vitro model prefer longitudinal experiments because the host-pathogen interaction in Mtb infection is often chronic [12]. Our report, however, provides analysis for a relatively short period of time.

Although new small format methods have been proposed to study Mtb infection and granuloma formation, these still rely in the utilization of PBMCs, which may still not traduce into tissue cell types that are involved in real granuloma formation. Also, PBMC from donors will introduce individual variability which could be eliminated using a commercially available cell line. Thus, more-advanced, physiologically comparable in vitro systems are required to study the complex host-pathogen interactions.

The VH is a transparent acellular, avascular ECM situated between the lens and retina, occupying 80% of the eye’s volume [15]. The vitreous gel is highly hydrated (with water constituting 98-99% of the total tissue), and composed of glycosaminoglycans, such as chondroitin sulfate and hyaluronic acid, collagen (predominantly collagen II and IX), and nonstructural proteins [24]. VH possesses immunological components, i.e., immunoglobulins, complement factors, and lysosomal enzymes, with demonstrated antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in vitro [25-28]. VH has been previously used as a source for ECM for cartilage tissue engineering application [15]. In our study, we show that hVH can serve as an ECM to produce a cellular aggregate in vitro that mimics the primary Mtb granuloma.

Caseous granulomas are multicellular aggregates that are pathognomonic for TB. The primary cellular components of these aggregate structures are monocyte-differentiated macrophages, which have been shown to be critical in containing Mtb and control mycobacterial proliferation in vivo [6]. It has been shown that human monocytes differentiate into tissue-specific macrophages through interaction with ECM [29]. Our morphological analysis revealed monocyte differentiation into macrophages under all conditions, including VH alone, suggesting that human monocytes interact with hVH and differentiate into macrophages without the need of additional stimuli. An in vitro environment, however, may not fully reflect the complexity of the monocyte-macrophage differentiation process in vivo, which also includes dynamic processes in which monocyte and macrophage-derived molecules contribute to ECM formation, stabilization, and function [30].

VH has been shown to be conducive of granuloma formation in a variety of inflammatory conditions of the eye, such as endophthalmitis, ocular manifestation of sarcoidosis, and Hodgkin’s lymphoma [31-33]. We report the formation of granulomatous aggregates in the highest numbers on macrophage cell cultures inoculated with Mtb in VH alone, VH with PMA, and VH with VD, respectively on day 3. A decrease in GLMA number was observed with time progression, with a secondary peak of GLMA formation on day 7 with VH alone and VH + PMA, and as early as day 6 with VH along with VD. VD has been linked to play a role in macrophage activation and granuloma formation [34]. Recent evidence suggests that Mtb orchestrates the early events of granuloma formation for its survival [35], freely proliferating inside of granulomas and utilizing virulence factors to promote granuloma dissociation [35]. As TB progresses, necrotic cell death results in bacterium leakage into the growth permissive extracellular environment and prevents Mtb from being phagocytosed by new macrophages, resulting in a decrease in the number of cell aggregates [6]. Further research is needed to assess these phenomena.

The molecular mechanism of granuloma formation is driven by macrophage-derived transcription factors including NF-kB and IRFs [36]. Activation of NF-kB and IRF pathways upregulate expression and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (such as interferon (IFN)-γ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-12, etc.) which interact with the ECM driving the immune response to Mtb [36]. Notably, NF-kB mediates bacterial load within a granuloma and granuloma size [37], and NF-kB mutants disrupt mycobacterial immunopathology in vivo resulting in disseminated TB sequelae. We observed NF-kB and IRF activation in VH-differentiated macrophages exposed to Mtb, with decreasing levels of NF-kB activation corresponding to lower number of and lesser area of GLMA. Inhibition of NF-kB decreases survival of intracellular Mtb in human macrophages, thus providing an avenue for future research to determine relationship between VH, ECM, NF-kB activation and Mtb survivability [38].

VH-differentiated macrophages also showed activation of IRF in response to Mtb. Current data suggest that IRFs play an important role in regulation macrophage polarization, granuloma necrosis, antigen presentation in myeloid cells during tuberculosis, and apoptosis of ECM in human mammary epithelial cells [39-42]. The formation of macrophage aggregates with denuded centers on day 3 provide may be associated with IRF activation, although the specifics of this interaction will need future investigation. Further study should broaden pathogen analysis with non-pathogenic Mtb species to further increase validity of findings. Moreover, we acknowledge that use of VH is susceptible to the patient-specific variability, much like the utilization of PBMCs. However, recent literature has suggested protocols to construct artificial VH which curtails this drawback and provides robust exploration through a commercially available product [43].

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study demonstrates that hVH serves as an effective ECM to study macrophage activation and granuloma-like macrophage aggregates upon Mtb infection in vitro. Future projects will seek to address translatability alongside pharmacotherapy, and molecular analysis.

Acknowledgments

Special recognition to donors participating in the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso Willed Body Program, for allowing us to pursue scientific projects from cadaveric tissues.

Financial Disclosure

No external funding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Author Contributions

SB, JR, and JB performed the experiments. SB and JR acquired data. JA and RB performed eyes and VH extraction. SB, JR, and JC analyzed the data. JC interpretation of data. SB, JR, and JC wrote the manuscript.

Data Availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


References▴Top 
  1. Bloom BR, Atun R, Cohen T, Dye C, Fraser H, Gomez GB, et al. Tuberculosis. Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 6): Major Infectious Diseases: The World Bank; 2017. p. 233-313.
    doi pubmed
  2. Jilani TN, Avula A, Gondal AZ, Siddiqui AH. Active Tuberculosis. StatPearls. 2021.
  3. Flynn JL, Chan J. Tuberculosis: latency and reactivation. Infect Immun. 2001;69(7):4195-4201.
    doi pubmed
  4. Colangeli R, Gupta A, Vinhas SA, Chippada Venkata UD, Kim S, Grady C, Jones-Lopez EC, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis progresses through two phases of latent infection in humans. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4870.
    doi pubmed
  5. Shea KM, Kammerer JS, Winston CA, Navin TR, Horsburgh CR, Jr. Estimated rate of reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection in the United States, overall and by population subgroup. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(2):216-225.
    doi pubmed
  6. Silva Miranda M, Breiman A, Allain S, Deknuydt F, Altare F. The tuberculous granuloma: an unsuccessful host defence mechanism providing a safety shelter for the bacteria? Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:139127.
    doi pubmed
  7. Guirado E, Schlesinger LS. Modeling the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Granuloma - the Critical Battlefield in Host Immunity and Disease. Front Immunol. 2013;4:98.
    doi pubmed
  8. Singh AK, Gupta UD. Animal models of tuberculosis: Lesson learnt. Indian J Med Res. 2018;147(5):456-463.
    doi pubmed
  9. Yang HJ, Wang D, Wen X, Weiner DM, Via LE. One size fits all? Not in in vivo modeling of tuberculosis chemotherapeutics. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2021;11:134.
    doi pubmed
  10. Keiser TL, Purdy GE. Killing mycobacterium tuberculosis in vitro: what model systems can teach us. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5(3):5.3.16.
    doi pubmed
  11. Je S, Quan H, Na Y, Cho SN, Kim BJ, Seok SH. An in vitro model of granuloma-like cell aggregates substantiates early host immune responses against Mycobacterium massiliense infection. Biol Open. 2016;5(8):1118-1127.
    doi pubmed
  12. Elkington P, Lerm M, Kapoor N, Mahon R, Pienaar E, Huh D, Kaushal D, et al. In vitro granuloma models of tuberculosis: potential and challenges. J Infect Dis. 2019;219(12):1858-1866.
    doi pubmed
  13. Elkington PT, Ugarte-Gil CA, Friedland JS. Matrix metalloproteinases in tuberculosis. Eur Respir J. 2011;38(2):456-464.
    doi pubmed
  14. Elkington PT, D'Armiento JM, Friedland JS. Tuberculosis immunopathology: the neglected role of extracellular matrix destruction. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3(71):71ps76.
    doi pubmed
  15. Lindberg GCJ, Longoni A, Lim KS, Rosenberg AJ, Hooper GJ, Gawlitta D, Woodfield TBF. Intact vitreous humor as a potential extracellular matrix hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater. 2019;85:117-130.
    doi pubmed
  16. Murali K, Kashani AH, Humayun MS. Whole vitreous humor dissection for vitreodynamic analysis. J Vis Exp. 2015;99:e52759.
    doi pubmed
  17. Tomlin H, Piccinini AM. A complex interplay between the extracellular matrix and the innate immune response to microbial pathogens. Immunology. 2018;155(2):186-201.
    doi pubmed
  18. Burgstaller G, Oehrle B, Gerckens M, White ES, Schiller HB, Eickelberg O. The instructive extracellular matrix of the lung: basic composition and alterations in chronic lung disease. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(1):1601805.
    doi pubmed
  19. Sorokin L. The impact of the extracellular matrix on inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10(10):712-723.
    doi pubmed
  20. Merline R, Moreth K, Beckmann J, Nastase MV, Zeng-Brouwers J, Tralhao JG, Lemarchand P, et al. Signaling by the matrix proteoglycan decorin controls inflammation and cancer through PDCD4 and MicroRNA-21. Sci Signal. 2011;4(199):ra75.
    doi pubmed
  21. Newman SL, Gootee L. Colony-stimulating factors activate human macrophages to inhibit intracellular growth of Histoplasma capsulatum yeasts. Infect Immun. 1992;60(11):4593-4597.
    doi pubmed
  22. Al Shammari B, Shiomi T, Tezera L, Bielecka MK, Workman V, Sathyamoorthy T, Mauri F, et al. The Extracellular Matrix Regulates Granuloma Necrosis in Tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2015;212(3):463-473.
    doi pubmed
  23. Kyburz KA, Anseth KS. Synthetic mimics of the extracellular matrix: how simple is complex enough? Ann Biomed Eng. 2015;43(3):489-500.
    doi pubmed
  24. Ponsioen TL, Hooymans JM, Los LI. Remodelling of the human vitreous and vitreoretinal interface—a dynamic process. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29(6):580-595.
    doi pubmed
  25. Grisanti S, Wiedemann P, Weller M, Heimann K, Zilles K. The significance of complement in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32(10):2711-2717.
  26. Stainer GA, Peyman GA, Berkowitz R, Tessler HH. Intraocular lysozyme in experimental uveitis in rabbits: aqueous and vitreous assay. Invest Ophthalmol. 1976;15(4):312-315.
  27. Egger SF, Buxbaum A, Georgopoulos M, Scholda C, Vecsei VP, Huber-Spitzy V, Georgopoulos A. Bacterial growth in human vitreous humor. Exp Eye Res. 1997;65(6):791-795.
    doi pubmed
  28. Davey P, Barza M, Peckman C. Spontaneous inhibition of bacterial growth in experimental gram-negative endophthalmitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28(5):867-873.
  29. de Fougerolles AR, Chi-Rosso G, Bajardi A, Gotwals P, Green CD, Koteliansky VE. Global expression analysis of extracellular matrix-integrin interactions in monocytes. Immunity. 2000;13(6):749-758.
    doi
  30. Chang MY, Chan CK, Braun KR, Green PS, O'Brien KD, Chait A, Day AJ, et al. Monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation: synthesis and secretion of a complex extracellular matrix. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(17):14122-14135.
    doi pubmed
  31. Ahmad S, Capiz-Correa D, Grossniklaus HE. Pyogenic granuloma of the retina: a case series. Ocul Oncol Pathol. 2019;5(3):176-181.
    doi pubmed
  32. Zissel G, Muller-Quernheim J. Sarcoidosis: historical perspective and immunopathogenesis (Part I). Respir Med. 1998;92(2):126-139.
    doi
  33. Mudhar HS, Fernando M, Sheard R, Rennie I. Paraneoplastic granulomatous vitritis and retinitis as a presentation of recurrent classical Hodgkin's lymphoma. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30(4):341-343.
    doi pubmed
  34. Chun RF, Adams JS, Hewison M. Immunomodulation by vitamin D: implications for TB. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2011;4(5):583-591.
    doi pubmed
  35. Ehlers S, Schaible UE. The granuloma in tuberculosis: dynamics of a host-pathogen collusion. Front Immunol. 2012;3:411.
    doi pubmed
  36. Kaisho T, Tanaka T. Turning NF-kappaB and IRFs on and off in DC. Trends Immunol. 2008;29(7):329-336.
    doi pubmed
  37. Fallahi-Sichani M, Kirschner DE, Linderman JJ. NF-kappaB signaling dynamics play a key role in infection control in tuberculosis. Front Physiol. 2012;3:170.
    doi pubmed
  38. Bai X, Feldman NE, Chmura K, Ovrutsky AR, Su WL, Griffin L, Pyeon D, et al. Inhibition of nuclear factor-kappa B activation decreases survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in human macrophages. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61925.
    doi pubmed
  39. Marquis JF, Kapoustina O, Langlais D, Ruddy R, Dufour CR, Kim BH, MacMicking JD, et al. Interferon regulatory factor 8 regulates pathways for antigen presentation in myeloid cells and during tuberculosis. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(6):e1002097.
    doi pubmed
  40. Gunthner R, Anders HJ. Interferon-regulatory factors determine macrophage phenotype polarization. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:731023.
    doi pubmed
  41. Bowie ML, Troch MM, Delrow J, Dietze EC, Bean GR, Ibarra C, Pandiyan G, et al. Interferon regulatory factor-1 regulates reconstituted extracellular matrix (rECM)-mediated apoptosis in human mammary epithelial cells. Oncogene. 2007;26(14):2017-2026.
    doi pubmed
  42. Aly S, Mages J, Reiling N, Kalinke U, Decker T, Lang R, Ehlers S. Mycobacteria-induced granuloma necrosis depends on IRF-1. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13(8B):2069-2082.
    doi pubmed
  43. Kummer MP, Abbott JJ, Dinser S, Nelson BJ. Artificial vitreous humor for in vitro experiments. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:6407-6410.
    doi pubmed


This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Clinical Infection and Immunity is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

     

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

AI in Clinical Medicine

Current Translational Medicine

Current Public Health and Epidemiology

Ophthalmology and Eye Health

Clinical Research of Dermatology

Food Sciences and Clinical Nutrition

Current Psychiatry and Mental Health

Current Emergency Medicine

Journal of Current Pharmacology

Current Dentistry and Oral Health

Current Research of Life Sciences

Journal of Sports Medicine Research

Journal of Minimally Invasive Medicine

Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine

Clinical Geriatric Medicine

Current Occupational Medicine

Journal of Current Surgery, quarterly, ISSN 1927-1298 (print), 1927-1301 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.currentsurgery.org   editorial contact: editor@currentsurgery.org    elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.