Clin Infect Immun
Clin Infect Immun, ISSN 2371-4972 print, 2371-4980 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Clin Infect Immun and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.ciijournal.org

Original Article

Volume 2, Number 1, March 2017, pages 1-4


Bronchoalveolar Wash: Proposal of a Cutting Point for Lactate Dehydrogenase in the Differential Diagnosis of Pulmonary Diseases

Anabela Angela Gabriela Angeleria, d, Adriana Esther Rochera, Caracciolo Beatrizb, Benjamin Barakianb, Sandra Muzettib, Patricia Vujacichc, Luis Alberto Palaoroa, Beatriz Perazzib

aUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Departamento de Bioquimica Clinica, Laboratorio de Citologia - INFIBIOC, C.A.B.A., Argentina
bUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Departamentode Bioquimica Clinica, Laboratorio de Quimica - INFIBIOC, C.A.B.A., Argentina
cUniversidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Medicina, Divisionde Neumologia, C.A.B.A., Argentina
dCorresponding Author: Anabela Angela Gabriela Angeleri, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Departamento de Bioquimica Clinica, Laboratorio de Citologia - INFIBIOC, C.A.B.A., Argentina

Manuscript accepted for publication February 02, 2017
Short title: Bronchoalveolar Wash
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cii60e

Abstract▴Top 

Background: The analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is of great clinical utility in the diagnosis of pulmonary diseases (PDs). The cytological study (total and differential cell count) performed routinely in these samples, has a high orientative power and is diagnostic in some cases. The study of soluble substances has provided little information. This study aimed to determine the cut-off point of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in the diagnosis of different lung diseases.

Methods: Two hundred forty-three BALs were selected from a total of 306 patients with a single respiratory disease: acute pneumonia due to common germs (NCG, n = 126), tuberculosis (TB, n = 20), mycotic pneumonia (MN, n = 12, N = 37) and interstitial diseases (IDs, n = 48). Cytological study and measurement of LDH activity were performed. The mean, standard deviation, sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp) and Youden index (YI) of this enzyme were determined. Student’s parametric and non-parametric Mann-Whitney tests were done (P < 0.05: significant).

Results: Comparing the means and standard deviations of LDH in the different PDs, a significant increase of this parameter was observed in the NCG compared to the other PDs: NCG vs. TB (P = 0.003); MN, MD and ID (P < 0.0001). Based on these significant differences observed, the cut-off point for LDH in NCG was evaluated. Different values were analyzed: LDH: ≥ 150 IU/L with S: 70%, Sp: 85% and YI: 0.55; ≥ 130 IU/L with S: 77%, Sp: 80% and YI: 0.57; ≥ 120 IU/L with S: 80%, Sp: 77% and YI: 0.57 and ≥ 100 IU/L with S: 86%, Sp: 74% and YI: 0.60.

Conclusions: It is proposed to perform the measurement of LDH activity for the differential diagnosis of NCG in the PD, since its mean value was significantly higher than the rest of the PD, using a cut-off point of LDH ≥ 100 IU/L; it showed a higher S and YI for the diagnosis of NCG screening. Increased LDH activity in NCG could be associated with the high number of leukocytes present in this pathology, superior to the rest of the PD. Measurement of LDH activity along with cell count would contribute to the diagnosis of PD.

Keywords: LDH; Cell count; Acute pneumonia due to common germs

Introduction▴Top 

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a diagnostic tool of great clinical utility that allows the sampling of secretions with leukocytes, other cellular components such as invasive bacteria, acellular components such as cytokines, viral particles and microbial components such as proteins and nucleic acids [1]. Analysis of BAL fluid may lead to the diagnosis of different pulmonary diseases (PDs) such as bacterial, parasitic, fungal, interstitial and malignant pathologies such as bronchoalveolar carcinoma and metastases of different types of tumors [2, 3]. The total and differential cell count is performed routinely, and has a high guideline value especially in interstitial diseases (IDs) that present a specific leukocyte pattern [4, 5]. The study of soluble substances found in BAL fluid has generally provided little information for the diagnosis of various PDs. However, the variations detected in the concentration of some components have been used as diagnostic elements and have allowed a considerable advance in the knowledge of the pathogenesis of respiratory diseases, especially those affecting the alveolo-interstitial region [6].

The measurement of enzymes in BAL has been little used and only some studies have been documented that evaluate the activity of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in specific pathologies such as Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia and in some IDs [7-9].

The usefulness of the measurement of LDH activity in BAL in the diagnosis of common germ pneumonia has not been studied and so far, the gold standard for its diagnosis remains the microbial culture that is a sensitive method and specific, but requiring at least 48 h to take appropriate medical conduct [10].

The objective of this work was to determine the cut-off point of LDH activity in the diagnosis of different PDs.

Materials and Methods▴Top 

A total of 306 BALs were obtained on the basis of a diagnostic requirement in the patients, including 243 patients with single respiratory disease: acute pneumonia due to common germs (NCG, n = 126), tuberculosis (TB, n = 20), mycotic pneumonia (MN, n = 12), malignant diseases (MDs, n = 37) and ID (n = 48). The different pathologies were categorized according to the clinical history and confirmed by culture for common germs (NCG), fungi (MN) and for mycobacteria (TB) and in certain cases by biopsies (MD).

The BAL was performed by instilling 100 mL of sterile physiological solution, preheated at 37 °C in three aliquots. The BAL sample was homogenized, an aliquot was removed for the total cell count and the remainder was centrifuged 10 min at 1,500 rpm. Duplicate samples were made from the pellet on slides for the differential cell count, which was performed by staining the samples with Giemsa and/or Papanicolaou for confirmation of malignancy.

The value of LDH activity was determined in the supernatant of the sample by automated method with Cobas 6000 autoanalyzer, module C-501 (Roche).

The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the enzyme in the different lung diseases were determined and the means were compared using Student’s parametric and non-parametric Mann-Whitney tests (P < 0.05: significant).

The following measures of diagnostic accuracy were analyzed: sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and Youden index (YI), with 95% confidence interval (CI) to determine the cut-off point of the LDH.

Results▴Top 

The mean total cell count in NCG was 2,053.79 ± 1,730.56 cells/mm3, with predominance of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in most of the samples evaluated (Table 1).

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. LDH Activity Values and Count Cell Expressed as Mean and Their Respective Standard Deviation in the Different Lung Diseases
 

The mean (μ) and standard deviation (SD) of the LDH activity expressed in IU/L were determined in the different PDs: NCG (561.96 ± 459.16); TB (205.80 ± 175.13): MN (137.667 ± 118.21); MD (81.35 ± 79.77) and ID (109.67 ± 99.10).

Comparing these values, a significant increase of this parameter was observed in the NCG compared to the other PDs: NCG vs. TB (P = 0.003); MN; MD and ID (P < 0.0001) (Table 1).

Based on these significant differences observed, the cut-off point of LDH in NCG was evaluated. Different values were analyzed: LDH: ≥ 150 IU/L, S: 70% and Sp: 85%; LDH ≥ 130 IU/L, S: 77% and Sp: 80%; LDH ≥ 120 IU/L, S: 80% and Sp: 77% and LDH ≥ 100 IU/L, S: 86% and Sp: 74%. Table 2 describes the S, Sp, PPV, NPV, PLR, NLR and YI for each LDH value.

Table 2.
Click to view
Table 2. S, Sp, PPV, NPV, PVR, RVN Values With Their 95% CI and YI Values for Each Proposed LDH Cut-Off Point
 
Discussion▴Top 

The measurement of different intracellular enzymes in the BAL supernatant could indicate injury to the interstitial tissue and contribute to the etiological diagnosis [11-13]. LDH is an intracellular enzyme found in different tissues of the body, but its presence is greater in the heart, liver, kidney, muscle, red blood cells, leukocytes, brain and lungs.

Currently the study of LDH activity has provided little information and only a few studies have evaluated its usefulness in the diagnosis of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia in immunosuppressed patients, observing an increased value of the activity of this enzyme independently of the cellular population found. These authors also observed that by measuring the LDH/albumin ratio in BAL vs. LDH/albumin in serum, BAL values were significantly increased over serum values, suggesting that the increase of LDH in BAL could be derived from a pulmonary source [7].

Other authors performed similar studies measuring the LDH activity in the serum of patients with Pneumocystis jirovenci pneumonia [14, 15].

Previous studies in animals indicate the usefulness of measuring LDH and alkaline phosphatase activity as markers for detecting inflammation and lung injury [11].

The increase in LDH activity observed in NCG could be associated with the higher number of leukocytes present in this pathology compared to the rest of the other lung diseases. According to the results obtained from the measurement of LDH activity in NCG, it was concluded that the value > 100 IU/L could be used as a cut-off point for this pathology as a screening test, since it showed the highest sensitivity and YI. To date, there are no reports in the literature that refer to the utility of a cut-off point for LDH activity in the diagnosis of different lung diseases.

Measurement of LDH activity, together with total and differential cell counts, could contribute to the diagnosis of PD and the immediate application of preventive/palliative treatment until the results of the microbial culture and the antibiogram that will define the diagnosis and the specific treatment. In this way, the diagnosis of NCG would be faster and more efficient, improving the quality of life of the patients.

Conclusion

It is proposed to perform the measurement of LDH activity for the differential diagnosis between NCG and the other PDs since its average value, sensitivity and YI were significantly higher than the rest of the PDs, using as screening a cut-off point LDH ≥ 100 IU/L. The measurement of this enzyme together with the total and differential cell count would contribute to the diagnosis of NCG.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions

The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. All authors have read the journal’s policy on conflicts of interest. All authors have read the journal’s authorship agreement.


References▴Top 
  1. Keith C. Meyer y col. Bronchoalveolar Lavage as a Diagnostic Tool. Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine. 2007;28(5).
  2. Meyer KC, Raghu G. Bronchoalveolar lavage for the evaluation of interstitial lung disease: is it clinically useful? Eur Respir J. 2011;38(4):761-769.
    doi pubmed
  3. Radha S, Afroz T, Prasad S, Ravindra N. Diagnostic utility of bronchoalveolar lavage. J Cytol. 2014;31(3):136-138.
    doi pubmed
  4. Meyer KC, Raghu G, Baughman RP, Brown KK, Costabel U, du Bois RM, Drent M, et al. An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: the clinical utility of bronchoalveolar lavage cellular analysis in interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185(9):1004-1014.
    doi pubmed
  5. Welker L, Jorres RA, Costabel U, Magnussen H. Predictive value of BAL cell differentials in the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases. Eur Respir J. 2004;24(6):1000-1006.
    doi pubmed
  6. Perez Arellano LJ, Gonzalez Buitrago JM, Alcazar Montero MC. y col. Utilidad de las determinaciones bioquimicas en el liquido de lavado broncoalveolar. Quimica Clinica. 1990;9(1):29-37.
  7. Smith RL, Ripps CS, Lewis ML. Elevated lactate dehydrogenase values in patients with Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Chest. 1988;93(5):987-992.
    doi pubmed
  8. Matusiewicz SP, Williamson IJ, Sime PJ, Brown PH, Wenham PR, Crompton GK, Greening AP. Plasma lactate dehydrogenase: a marker of disease activity in cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis and extrinsic allergic alveolitis? Eur Respir J. 1993;6(9):1282-1286.
    pubmed
  9. Hoffman RM, Rogers RM. Serum and lavage lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;143(1):42-46.
    doi pubmed
  10. Andres Martina A, Moreno-Perez D, Alfayate Miguelez S. Etiologia y diagnostico de la neumonia adquirida en la comunidad y sus formas complicadas. An Pediatr (Barc). 2012;76(3):162.e1-162.e18.
  11. Drent M, Cobben NA, Henderson RF, Wouters EF, van Dieijen-Visser M. Usefulness of lactate dehydrogenase and its isoenzymes as indicators of lung damage or inflammation. Eur Respir J. 1996;9(8):1736-1742.
    doi pubmed
  12. Emad A, Rezaian GR. Lactate dehydrogenase in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis. Respiration. 1999;66(1):41-45.
    doi pubmed
  13. Henderson RF, Rebar AH, Pickrell JA, Newton GJ. Early damage indicators in the lung. III. Biochemical and cytological response of the lung to inhaled metal salts. Toxicol. Appl Pharmacol. 1979.
    doi
  14. Andrea Ruiz de Arechavaleta C1, Sofia Pena R1 y Col. Caracteristicas clinicas y de laboratorio de la neumonia por Pneumocystisjiroveci en pacientes admitidos en el Hospital Clinico de la Universidad de Chile. Revista Chilena De Medicina Intensiva. 2006;21(1):27-32.
  15. Cortes Telles A, Juarez Hernandez F, Pena E y col. Neumonia por Pneumocystisjirovecii en pacientes con VIH. Neumol Cir Torax. 70(3):165-171.


This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Clin Infect Immun is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

     

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

AI in Clinical Medicine

Current Translational Medicine

Current Public Health and Epidemiology

Ophthalmology and Eye Health

Clinical Research of Dermatology

Food Sciences and Clinical Nutrition

Current Psychiatry and Mental Health

Current Emergency Medicine

Journal of Current Pharmacology

Current Dentistry and Oral Health

Current Research of Life Sciences

Journal of Sports Medicine Research

Journal of Minimally Invasive Medicine

Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine

Clinical Geriatric Medicine

Current Occupational Medicine

Journal of Current Surgery, quarterly, ISSN 1927-1298 (print), 1927-1301 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.currentsurgery.org   editorial contact: editor@currentsurgery.org    elmer.editorial2@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.